期刊检索

  • 2026年第58卷
  • 2025年第57卷
  • 2024年第56卷
  • 2023年第55卷
  • 2022年第54卷
  • 2021年第53卷
  • 2020年第52卷
  • 2019年第51卷
  • 2018年第50卷
  • 2017年第49卷
  • 2016年第48卷
  • 2015年第47卷
  • 2014年第46卷
  • 2013年第45卷
  • 2012年第44卷
  • 2011年第43卷
  • 2010年第42卷
  • 第1期
  • 第2期

主管单位 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部 主办单位 哈尔滨工业大学 主编 李隆球 国际刊号ISSN 0367-6234 国内刊号CN 23-1235/T

期刊网站二维码
微信公众号二维码
引用本文:徐粒寒,徐略勤,周建庭,袁茂均.大跨CFST拱桥考虑成拱过程的地震响应分析方法[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2026,58(2):31.DOI:10.11918/202410043
XU Lihan,XU Lueqin,ZHOU Jianting,YUAN Maojun.Analysis method for seismic response of large-span CFST arch bridge considering arch forming process[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2026,58(2):31.DOI:10.11918/202410043
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1197次   下载 416 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
大跨CFST拱桥考虑成拱过程的地震响应分析方法
徐粒寒1,徐略勤1,2,周建庭2,袁茂均1
(1.重庆交通大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400074;2.山区桥梁及隧道工程国家重点实验室(重庆交通大学),重庆 400074)
摘要:
为探究成拱过程对大跨钢管混凝土(concrete filled steel tube,CFST)拱桥地震响应的影响机制,阐释了典型成拱过程与拱肋截面应力累积历程,提出考虑成拱过程的非线性动力接续分析方法,并通过Midas/Civil专业施工分析模块验证分析方法对成桥初始状态的分析精度。从钢管和管内混凝土地震应变响应、主拱地震位移响应等角度对比分析成拱过程的影响规律,基于“中介效应分析”剖析成拱过程对大跨CFST拱桥地震响应的影响机制。建立了考虑成拱过程前后钢管与管内混凝土地震应变响应的映射关系,提出地震响应简化修正分析方法。结果表明:提出的分析方法可达到与Midas/Civil专业施工分析非常接近的精度,钢管峰值应力误差仅为6.8%,管内混凝土应力曲线几乎重合;考虑成拱过程后,钢管和管内混凝土应变不再符合平截面假定,在地震作用下考虑成拱过程与否会导致CFST主拱进入不同的弹塑性状态,其差异随峰值地面加速度(PGA,aPG)的增大而增大;在主拱截面塑性发展程度较低时,成桥初始状态差异起决定性影响,而在塑性发展程度较高时,材料塑性发展程度差异成为关键影响因素;所提出的简化修正分析方法精度较高,钢管及管内混凝土峰值应变误差均值分别仅为2.9%和5.5%。
关键词:  大跨钢管混凝土拱桥  成拱过程  地震响应  非线性时程分析  中介效应分析  简化修正方法
DOI:10.11918/202410043
分类号:U442.5
文献标识码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(52378482);重庆英才计划(cstc2022ycjh-bgzxm0133);四川省交通运输科技项目(2023-ZL-03)
Analysis method for seismic response of large-span CFST arch bridge considering arch forming process
XU Lihan1,XU Lueqin1,2,ZHOU Jianting2,YUAN Maojun1
(1.School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Mountain Bridge and Tunnel Engineering(Chongqing Jiaotong University), Chongqing 400074, China)
Abstract:
In order to explore the influence mechanism of arch formation process on the seismic response of large-span concrete filled steel tube (CFST) arch bridges, the typical arch formation process and the stress accumulation history of the arch rib section are first explained. A nonlinear dynamic sequential analysis method is proposed for large-span CFST arch bridges considering the construction process, and the accuracy of the proposed method in obtaining the initial state of bridge is validated against Midas/Civil professional construction analysis module. The influence laws of the arch formation process are investigated from the perspectives of seismic responses of steel pipe and infilling concrete strains, as well as seismic response of the main arch displacement. Based on the "mediating effect analysis", the influencing mechanism of the arch formation process on the seismic response of large-span CFST arch bridges is addressed. Finally, a mapping relationship between the seismic strain responses of steel pipe and infilling concrete obtained with and without considering the arch formation process is established. A simplified corrective analysis method is proposed for seismic response of large-span CFST arch bridges. The research results indicate that the proposed analysis method can achieve accuracy very close to that of Midas/Civil professional construction analysis, with a peak stress error of only 6.8% for steel pipes and almost overlapping stress curves for infilling concrete. When considering the arch formation process of the main arch, the strain distribution of the steel pipe and infilling concrete no longer conforms to the plane section assumption. Under earthquakes, whether the arch formation process is considered leads to different elastic-plastic states in the CFST main arch, with the discrepancies increasing as the peak ground acceleration (PGA, aPG) rises. When the plastic development degree of the main arch section is low, the differences in the initial state of the completed bridge are critically influential. Conversely, when the plastic development degree is high, the degree of material plasticity becomes the key influencing factor. The proposed simplified corrective analysis method has high accuracy, with average peak strain errors of only 2.9% for the steel pipes and 5.5% for the infilling concrete.
Key words:  large-span CFST arch bridge  arch formation process  seismic response  nonlinear time history analysis  mediating effect analysis  simplified correction method

友情链接LINKS